Current:Home > MyFederal judge reimposes limited gag order in Donald Trump’s 2020 election interference case-DB Wealth Institute B2 Expert Reviews
Federal judge reimposes limited gag order in Donald Trump’s 2020 election interference case
View Date:2025-01-10 07:57:48
WASHINGTON (AP) — The federal judge overseeing Donald Trump’s 2020 election interference case in Washington on Sunday reimposed a narrow gag order barring him from making public comments targeting prosecutors, court staff and potential witnesses.
The reinstatement of the gag order was revealed in a brief notation on the online case docket Sunday night, but the order itself was not immediately available, making it impossible to see the judge’s rationale or the precise contours of the restrictions.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is presiding over the federal case charging Trump with plotting to overturn the results of the 2020 election, had temporarily lifted the gag order as she considered the former president’s request to keep it on hold while he challenges the restrictions on his speech in higher courts.
But Chutkan agreed to reinstate the order after prosecutors cited Trump’s recent social media comments about his former chief of staff they said represented an attempt to influence and intimidate a likely witness in the case.
The order is a fresh reminder that Trump’s penchant for incendiary and bitter rants about the four criminal cases that he’s facing, though politically beneficial in rallying his supporters as he seeks to reclaim the White House, carry practical consequences in court. Two separate judges have now imposed orders mandating that he rein in his speech, with the jurist presiding over a civil fraud trial in New York issuing a monetary fine last week.
A request for comment was sent Sunday to a Trump attorney, Todd Blanche. Trump in a social media post late Sunday acknowledged that the gag order was back in place, calling it “NOT CONSITUTIONAL!”
Trump’s lawyers have said they will seek an emergency stay of the order from the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. The defense has said Trump is entitled to criticize prosecutors and “speak truth to oppression.”
Trump has denied any wrongdoing in the case. He has made a central part of his 2024 campaign for president vilifying special counsel Jack Smith and others involved the criminal cases against him, casting himself as the victim of a politicized justice system.
Prosecutors have said Trump’s verbal attacks threaten to undermine the integrity of the case and risk inspiring his supporters to violence.
Smith’s team said Trump took advantage of the recent lifting of the gag order to “send an unmistakable and threatening message” to his former chief of staff, Mark Meadows, who was reported by ABC News to have received immunity to testify before a grand jury.
The former president mused on social media about the possibility that Meadows would give testimony to Smith in exchange for immunity. One part of the post said: “Some people would make that deal, but they are weaklings and cowards, and so bad for the future our Failing Nation. I don’t think that Mark Meadows is one of them but who really knows?”
In a separate case, Trump was fined last week $10,000 after the judge in his civil fraud trial in New York said the former president had violated a gag order.
___
Richer reported from Boston.
veryGood! (11)
Related
- 'We suffered great damage': Fierce California wildfire burns homes, businesses
- The first smart gun with facial and fingerprint recognition is now for sale
- Johnny Depp Shares About Life in Rural England and Being Shy During Rare Interview
- Lucy Hale, Ashley Benson and Troian Bellisario Have a Pretty Little Liars Reunion
- Eva Longoria Shares She and Her Family Have Moved Out of the United States
- How Naya Rivera's Son Josey Is Already Following In His Parents' Footsteps
- Dogecoin price spikes after Elon Musk changes Twitter logo to the Shiba Inu dog
- Mitch Landrieu is Biden's man to rebuild America and deliver broadband to millions
- Supreme Court seems likely to allow class action to proceed against tech company Nvidia
- Hayden Panettiere Shares What Really Hurts About Postpartum Struggles
Ranking
- Mike Tyson vs. Jake Paul press conference highlights: 'Problem Child' goads 'Iron Mike'
- A color-changing lizard and Muppet orchid are among 380 newly found species – many of which are under threat
- Russian court extends Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich's detention by 3 months
- How Naya Rivera's Son Josey Is Already Following In His Parents' Footsteps
- Groups seek a new hearing on a Mississippi mail-in ballot lawsuit
- '9 Years of Shadows' Review: Symphony of the Light
- Reese Witherspoon and Husband Jim Toth Break Up After 11 Years of Marriage
- 'Street Fighter 6' takes bold swings that (mostly) pay off
Recommendation
-
Oprah Winfrey denies being paid $1M for Kamala Harris rally: 'I was not paid a dime'
-
Designer in Supreme Court ruling cited client who denies making wedding site request
-
Ulta 24-Hour Flash Sale: Take 50% Off MAC, Tula, Tarte, and Persona
-
Shootout at Baja California car rally in Mexico near U.S. border leaves 10 dead, 10 wounded
-
World War II veteran reflects on life as he turns 100
-
Kourtney Kardashian Reads Mean TikToks About Herself
-
'March of the Machine' early review: Mom invades Magic: The Gathering's multiverse
-
The Fate of Grey's Anatomy Revealed